Trump Says U.S. Will Take Control of Gaza

Source: Anadolu / Getty

Former President Donald Trump’s recent proposal to “take over” Gaza and resettle its population has sparked widespread outrage and concern, especially among Palestinians and those advocating for international law. This suggestion comes in the midst of an already devastating humanitarian crisis, as Gaza remains heavily damaged after months of intense war. According to the United Nations, approximately two-thirds of Gaza’s buildings have been destroyed, leaving the population in dire need of aid. Trump’s remarks, while vague, could be a dangerous deviation from long-established U.S. policy in the Middle East. This proposal challenges international norms that have long supported the concept of a two-state solution, where a Palestinian state—including Gaza and the occupied West Bank—would coexist peacefully alongside Israel.

Text “RICKEY” to 71007 to join the Rickey Smiley Morning Show mobile club for exclusive news. (Terms and conditions).

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed interest in the idea, saying it is “worth paying attention to,” the proposal has been rejected by Arab nations and other U.S. allies, raising alarms about the impact on Palestinian rights and the potential for further suffering. Critics argue that Trump’s plan not only disregards international law but also threatens to further dispossess the Palestinian people of their land and future. The notion of forcibly removing or encouraging Palestinians to leave their homeland contradicts the fundamental rights of the population, many of whom have lived in Gaza for generations. For Palestinians, this idea invokes painful memories of the 1948 Nakba, when hundreds of thousands were displaced from their homes.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE. 

Trump framed his proposal as a practical solution, suggesting that rebuilding Gaza would be nearly impossible with its population still in place. He suggested the creation of a U.S.-owned development, which he described as a “Riviera of the Middle East.” But this vision ignores the legal and moral implications of displacing nearly two million people. The forced removal of Gazans would violate international law, particularly the Geneva Conventions, which protect the rights of civilians in occupied territories. The idea of permanent displacement would further deepen the wounds of those who have already endured unimaginable suffering.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD OUR APP AND TAKE US WITH YOU ANYWHERE!

Palestinian leaders have accused Israel of hindering the delivery of humanitarian aid and delaying the arrival of temporary housing to those displaced by the conflict. Meanwhile, Trump’s suggestion that neighboring countries like Egypt and Jordan should absorb the refugees has been quickly rejected. Both countries have their own economic and political challenges and have refused to take in large numbers of displaced Palestinians. This highlights the complexities of the situation and the profound need for a solution that respects the rights of Palestinians and adheres to international law.

Related Article: Nearly Two Dozen Killed in Israeli Strikes, Including Children

Related Article: The Weeknd Donates $2 Million to Provide 18 Million Loaves of Bread to Combat Famine in Gaza

Beyond the humanitarian and legal implications, Trump’s proposal also raises profound questions about the future of Palestinian statehood. Historically, efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have envisioned a two-state solution, with Gaza and the West Bank forming the territorial foundation of a Palestinian state. By suggesting that Palestinians abandon Gaza entirely, Trump’s plan undermines any chance of a unified Palestinian state. For many Palestinians, Gaza is not just land—it is a symbol of their struggle for self-determination and their right to exist as a people. Losing Gaza would be seen not only as a territorial loss but as an existential blow to the Palestinian cause.

As the world grapples with the aftermath of this crisis, any solution must prioritize justice, self-determination, and adherence to international law. Trump’s proposal, by encouraging the displacement of Palestinians and effectively disregarding their rights, seems to prioritize ambition over these critical principles. This leaves many questioning whether this plan truly offers a path to peace or simply deepens the cycle of injustice and dispossession that Palestinians have faced for decades.

HEAD BACK TO THE RICKEYSMILEYMORNINGSHOW.COM HOMEPAGE